Amplify’d from www.pressonline.rs

Srbiju udaljiti od Rusije i Kosova!

EU pokreće pitanje hapšenja Mladića kada god želi da uceni Srbiju. Suština je u udaljavanju Srbije od Rusije i teranje naše zemlje da odustane od Kosova

Holandija uvek tu kada treba ucenjivati Srbiju...Boris Tadić i holandski ministar spoljnih poslova Maksim Ferhagen

Politika Evropske unije je da Srbiju udalji od Rusije i istovremeno natera našu zemlju da odustane od Kosova i Metohije, ocenjuju politički analitičari. Oni tvrde da se upravo zbog toga pitanje hapšenja Ratka Mladića pokreće uvek kada Unija ostane bez drugih ucenjivačkih metoda. Urednik sajta Novi standard Željko Cvijanović objašnjava zašto se pitanje hapšenja Mladića sada ponovo „resetuje".

- Od 2000. do 2008. godine Mladić je bio izgovor i oruđe za razbijanje Vojske Srbije, što je za Zapad bio daleko značajniji cilj nego samo hapšenje Mladića. Sada preti opasnost da Mladić postane nešto slično - izgovor da Srbiju drže na distanci od EU, a da se ona istovremeno natera da se drži što dalje od Istoka, pre svega Rusije i Kine - objašnjava Cvijanović.

On dodaje da Mladićevo hapšenje nije prioritet za međunarodnu zajednicu. - Ne znači da međunarodna zajednica ne želi Mladićevo hapšenje, ali joj u političkom smislu to nije prioritet. Hapšenje Mladića je samo evropski način pregovaranja sa jednom posrnulom, nemoćnom, korumpiranom i u suštini antievropskom vladom. Ova vlada ima antievropski zakon o medijima, legalizovala je korupciju, izvršila antievropsku reformu pravosuđa, koja je u suštini partijska... Evropa na to ćuti i kaže „ne interesuje nas šta radiš, što više brljaš, duže ćeš da sediš u čekaonici, a ja ću od tebe više da tražim". A traže da ne idemo ka Rusiji i da odustanemo od Kosova.

Ljajić: Tražimo Mladića, ali ćutimo

Predsednik Nacionalnog saveta za saradnju sa Haškim tribunalom Rasim Ljajić kaže da je potraga za Ratkom Mladićem intenzivna.

- To što u medijima nema toliko tekstova i izveštaja o potragama, ne znači da se one ne sprovode. Mislim da je korisno da se što više radi na terenu, a da bude što manje u medijima - rekao je Ljajić.

Upitan da li je moguće da potraga ipak ne da konačan rezultat, odnosno da Mladić umre prirodnom smrću, a da se to ne sazna, Ljajić je kratko odgovorio: „To je malo verovatno."

Holandija radi šta kažu Amerikanci

Osvrćući se na stav Holandije da je hapšenje Mladića i Gorana Hadžića i dalje najvažniji osnov za nastavak procesa evropskih integracija Srbije, Cvijanović kaže da se varaju svi koji misle da je Holandija nezavisan faktor u EU.

- Kako Holandija nije bila nezavisna kada su nam ukidali vize? Ona se srećom namestila da je zainteresovana za Srebrenicu i Mladića, pa se to koristi kada treba blokirati evropske integracije. Iza svega toga stoje SAD i delom EU. Verujem da će Hilari Klinton kada 12. oktobra dođe u Beograd reći „ne brinite, smirićemo Holandiju, ali dajte nam potpunu lojalnost u vezi sa Kosovom - ne otežite i nemoj da vam padne na pamet da pokrećete priču o statusu" - rekao je Cvijanović.

U EU ne pre 2030.

Direktor Foruma za etničke odnose Dušan Janjić smatra da je potpuno ispravan stav Holandije da su kompromis koji je Srbija postigla sa EU u vezi rezolucije o Kosovu i prosleđivanje kandidature dva nepovezana pitanja.

- Kada ste od nekog evropskog zvaničnika čuli da će naša kandidatura biti prosleđena EU zbog menjanja rezolucije? Nikad! Problem je u našim političarima koji manipulišu građanima, kažu nam „mi njima rezoluciju, oni će nama kandidaturu". Poruka Brisela je bila da će napraviti mapu ubrzanog pristupa Srbije ako dogovori rezoluciju o Kosovu i uđe u dijalog s Prištinom. Dakle, ako Tadić i Tači sednu za pregovarački sto pre 26. oktobra kada se održava Savet ministara EU, oni će da naprave tu agendu, što opet ne znači kandidaturu - tvrdi Janjić.

Prema njegovim rečima, Srbija nije ispunila osnovne pretpostavke da dobije status kandidata, a srpski političari imaju opasnu naviku da za nerad i loš rad odgovornost prebacuju na međunarodnu zajednicu.

Ucenjivanje Mladićem je evropski način pregovaranja sa posrnulom, korumpiranom i antievropskom vladom ... Željko Cvijanović, urednik sajta Novi standard

- Bramerc je nezadovoljan zbog neisporučivanja Mladića, što je Holandiji uslov za sve. I šta je tu iznenađenje? Ništa! Kriva im Holandija što ne menja stav, a oni su nevini što nisu uhapsili Mladića. Nisu u stanju ni da obezbede Paradu ponosa, izbore se sa Šarićem, a oni će da uhapse Mladića. Usvajaju antievropske zakone o medijima, pravosuđu, legalizaciji zemljišta... Tvrde da Kosovo nije uslov za EU, a kada usaglase rezoluciju o Kosovu sa Briselom kažu da ćemo za to dobiti kandidaturu. Potpuno neozbiljna politika. Pa takve nas niko neće u EU - misli Janjić. Komentator „Politike" Ljubodrag Stojadinović kaže da Srbija pre 2030. sigurno neće ući u Uniju.

- Srbija je kao ekonomski, informaciono, teritorijalno i vojno rasparčana država pogodna za manipulaciju. Zato mi nikada, u najboljem slučaju pre 2030, nećemo biti član EU. To nije u interesu Evrope - zaključuje Stojadinović.

B. BOJIĆ Read more at www.pressonline.rs

 

See this Amp at http://bit.ly/cWnYJI

Pro Libertate: "Pre-emptive" Nuclear War: The Safeties Are Off

Amplify’d from freedominourtime.blogspot.com

el.

The NATO Blob: All of the countries colored anything but blue are members of the alliance, with more to come. Some neo-"Conservatives" have suggested that membership should be extended to Israel.

After half a century in which it never fired a shot, NATO celebrated its 50th anniversary by conducting its first military exercise – the 78-day terror bombing of Yugoslavia, for the purpose of ending an anti-Albanian “genocide” that was as phony as the Iraqi WMD arsenal. Rather than repelling Soviet armor, NATO was attacking Serbian bridges, hospitals, power plants, and television stations -- even the occasional column of Albanian refugees displaced by NATO's attacks on the Serbs. Eventually the Serbs were forced to concede control over Kosovo to a radical Muslim terrorist group that was chummy with both Osama bin Laden and the Albanian mafia, and – of course – the CIA.

Now we're told by the authors of the NATO “reform” blueprint that the option of a nuclear first strike is justified because the alliance has to gird its loins to confront “political fanaticism and religious fundamentalism ... [as well as] international terrorism [and] organized crime....” The so-called Kosovo Liberation Army, the beneficiary of NATO's terror bombing of Serbia, embodies all of those attributes.

NATO's attack on Serbia, a nation with religious and cultural ties to Russia, nearly led to the shooting war with Russia we've thus far avoided. That war could easily have erupted had Sir Michael Jackson, the unfortunately named British General in charge of securing the Pristina airport, been as short-tempered as NATO Supreme Commander Wesley Clarke in dealing with the 206 Russian paratroopers who “secured” that facility. Clarke wanted Jackson to remove the Russian troops forcibly; Jackson agreed that the Russians had to leave, but he preferred to negotiate their exit rather than “starting World War III.”

General Jackson, whose troops would have been the ones exchanging fire with the Russians, exercised a field veto over the orders he received from Wesley Clarke. The NATO “reform” proposal, which envisions “faster action through an end to national vetoes” and an “end to national caveats,” would probably foreclose the similar exercise of discretion by field commanders in the future. This isn't a comforting thought when coupled with the idea that NATO will probably get into the business of counter-proliferation through nuclear aggression.

As mentioned above, NATO has moved its sphere of operations into Russia's “near abroad,” a development that must be looked upon with both frustration and anger by Moscow. Putin's regime has a decent intelligence capacity (which we'd expect with a “former” KGB officer and his cadre of siloviki in charge).

Oh, great: As if we didn't have enough to worry about, Russia has apparently entered an alliance with the Spaceballs.

So it's not a surprise that Moscow apparently scooped the western press on the new NATO “reform” document, and wanted to fire a rhetorical warning shot at the western Alliance. At least that's how I read last week's announcement by Gen. Yuri Baluyevsky, Russia's military chief of staff, that in defense of “the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Russia and its allies,” military force would be used “preventively, including with the use of nuclear weapons.”

________________

*NATO was designed as a political and military subsidiary of the UN. Foreign Affairs Outlines: Building the Peace, a State Department document published in Spring 1949 explained that NATO was designed to "bring about world conditions which will permit the United Nations to function more efficiently." Secretary of State Dean Acheson (CFR) elaborated on that view in a March 1949 speech in Washington: “[NATO] is designed to fit precisely into the framework of the United Nations and to assure practical measures for maintaining peace and security in harmony with the Charter.... The United States government and the governments with which we are associated in this [NATO] treaty are convinced that it is an essential measure for strengthening the United Nations....” Read more at freedominourtime.blogspot.com

 

See this Amp at http://bit.ly/dvmc4R

CrazyHacker's Amplify Page | Amplify.com

URL:  http://crazyhacker.amplify.com/

Checkout Amplify !

See this Amp at http://bit.ly/brd0C6

This is my first post on Amplify! Also this is my Amplify page http://bit.ly/bjXN8J

Poruka siptarima od Ultra Srba